Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of Atopic Eczema - Part 1: Systemic therapy, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA).

SIDeMaST (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Medica, Chirurgica, Estetica e delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmesse) contributed to the development of the present guideline on the systemic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. With the permission of EuroGuiDerm, SIDeMaST adapted the guideline to the Italian healthcare context to supply a reliable and affordable tool to Italian physicians who take care of patients affected by atopic dermatitis. The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for pediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of atopic eczema Part 2: non-systemic treatments and treatment recommendations for special AE patient populations, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Occupational Dermatology (SIDAPA).

SIDeMaST (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Medica, Chirurgica, Estetica e delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmesse) contributed to the development of the present guideline on the systemic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. With the permission of EuroGuiDerm, SIDeMaST adapted the guideline to the Italian healthcare context to supply a reliable and affordable tool to Italian physicians who take care of patients affected by atopic dermatitis. The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This second part of the guideline includes recommendations and detailed information on basic therapy with emollients and moisturizers, topical anti-inflammatory treatment, antimicrobial and antipruritic treatment and UV phototherapy. Furthermore, this part of the guideline covers techniques for avoiding provocation factors, as well as dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine and educational interventions for patients with atopic eczema and deals with occupational and psychodermatological aspects of the disease. It also contains guidance on treatment for pediatric and adolescent patients and pregnant or breastfeeding women, as well as considerations for patients who want to have a child. A chapter on the patient perspective is also provided. The first part of the guideline, published separately, contains recommendations and guidance on systemic treatment with conventional immunosuppressive drugs, biologics and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, as well as information on the scope and purpose of the guideline, and a section on guideline methodology.

Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of atopic eczema - First Update, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Occupational Dermatology (SIDAPA).

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema, published in JEADV on 18 August 2022 (part 1) and 3 September 2022 (part 2) was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. To reflect the most recent evidence on novel systemic medications, an update was published in October 2022. According to the purpose of the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA) to adapt the EuroGuiDerm guideline on the treatment of atopic eczema into the Italian Healthcare setting, the original update has been supplemented by inserting notes, well highlighted by the original text, to emphasize the laws, rules, procedures and suggestions of the Italian Ministry of Health and regional Health authorities.

The Role of OX40-OX40L Axis in the Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis.

OX40 is a co-stimulatory immune checkpoint molecule that promotes the activation and the effector function of T lymphocytes through interaction with its ligand (OX40L) on antigen-presenting cells. OX40-OX40L axis plays a crucial role in Th1 and Th2 cell expansion, particularly during the late phases or long-lasting response. Atopic dermatitis is characterized by an immune dysregulation of Th2 activity and by an overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13. Other molecules involved in its pathogenesis include thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-33, and IL-25, which contribute to the promotion of OX40L expression on dendritic cells. Lesional skin in atopic dermatitis exhibits a higher level of OX40L+-presenting cells compared with other dermatologic diseases or normal skin. Recent clinical trials using antagonizing anti-OX40 or anti-OX40L antibodies have shown symptom improvement and cutaneous manifestation alleviation in patients with atopic dermatitis. These findings suggest the relevance of the OX40-OX40L axis in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis.

Does sensitive skin lie in epidermal barrier impairment or abnormalities? Results from an observational study assessing biophysical parameters.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of sensitive skin is largely unknown and no univocal data on the role of the epidermal barrier impairment have been identified. The aim of this study was to assess whether subjects with or without sensitive skin differ for some biophysical skin parameters, which reflect skin barrier integrity or skin hyperactivity. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study included adult volunteers not affected with chronic inflammatory skin diseases who attended the Unit of Dermatology and the Center of Cosmetology of the University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, between March 2021 and November 2022. All subjects, subdivided into those with or without sensitive skin, based on either Lactic Acid Stinging Test (LAST) result or a questionnaire-based skin sensitivity score ≥4, were tested for transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin elasticity and hydrations and dermographism. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-seven subjects were included. No significant differences in terms of TEWL, elasticity and hydration levels were recorded between subjects with sensitive skin and those without, subdivided according to both the LAST result and the questionnaire score. Dermographism was elicited more in subjects with sensitive skin than in the others, although without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The study failed to find significant biophysical differences between sensitive and non-sensitive skin. Therefore, the role of skin barrier impairment does not appear to be a necessary condition in determining an abnormal skin sensitivity to potentially unpleasant and irritating stimuli. These findings indirectly support the relevance of a peripheral sensory neural hyperactivity in the pathophysiology of sensitive skin.

The new Italian SIDAPA Baseline Series for patch testing (2023): an update according to the new regulatory pathway for contact allergens.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin disease caused by delayed hypersensitivity to chemical and biotic contact allergens. ACD significantly affects the patients' quality of life negatively impacting both occupational and non-occupational settings. Patch testing is the gold standard diagnostic in vivo test to precise the ACD etiology and to correctly perform prevention. According to the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) legislative decree no. 178 of 29th May 1991, allergens are defined as medicines and therefore they are subject to strict regulation. In 2017, AIFA (decree no. 2130/2017) started a procedure to regulate contact allergens on the Italian market and actually the contact allergens temporarily authorized are reported in AIFA decree no. 98/2022, valid until November 2023. The availability on the market of contact allergens to diagnose ACD and continuous updating on the basis of new epidemiological trends are mandatory, jointly with the continuous update of the baseline and integrative series for patch testing. For this reason, the scientific community represented in Italy by the Skin Allergies Study Group of SIDeMaST (Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology) and SIDAPA (Italian Society of Allergological, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology) are constantly working, in close relationship with the European scientific communities with large expertise in this important sector of the modern Dermatology. Herein, we report the setting up of regulatory legislation by AIFA and the new Italian Adult Baseline Series for patch testing.

A Longitudinal Multiinstitutional Study of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: From Childhood to Perimenopause.

OBJECTIVE: The main outcome of this study was the evaluation of clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and therapeutic approaches in patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) aged from childhood to perimenopause. Secondly, it was intended to compare these characteristics according to the menarchal status. METHODS: Patients less than 45 years of age with a diagnosis of VLS from January 2002 to June 2022 in 10 referral centers were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. The univariate analysis compared the dependent variables according to menarchal status. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. At diagnosis, between 25% and 40% of premenarchal patients reported signs related to subepithelial hemorrhage. A significantly greater presence of bleeding (p < .005), easy bruising (p = .028), fissures (p = .008), petechiae/splinter hemorrhages (p < .001), and bleeding/blistering or open sores (p = .011) was observed in premenarchal patients with respect to the postmenarchal group. The perineum (p = .013) and the perianal region (p < .001) were significantly more involved in the premenarchal group. Topical calcineurin inhibitors were more used in the premenarchal population (p = .004), whereas vitamin E oil and moisturizers were more used in the postmenarchal population (p = .047). CONCLUSIONS: Vulvar lichen sclerosus is a chronic condition that can cause vulvar changes that result in severe morbidity and affects sexual function and quality of life, even before menopause. Vulvar lichen sclerosus continues to be misdiagnosed in this population. This may lead to an average delay from symptom onset to diagnosis. Evaluating clinical manifestations of VLS in premenarchal and postmenarchal age allowed us to find different clinical characteristics between the 2 periods suggestive of the diagnosis.

Topical Corticosteroid Phobia Among Women Affected With Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Results From a Cross-sectional Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Topical corticosteroid (TC) phobia (TCP) is common in subjects affected with chronic inflammatory skin diseases who need prolonged corticosteroid treatments. The aim of this study was to assess TCP in women affected with vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study included adult patients with VLS who either started or were undergoing a TC treatment at our vulva unit between May 2022 and May 2023. All patients completed the self-administered TOPICOP questionnaire, which is validated for measuring concerns, worries, and beliefs about TC use. The scores obtained were analyzed in relation to demographic, history, and clinical data. RESULTS: The majority of the 165 (92.1%, 66.5 ± 11.9 years) included patients who had previously undergone TC treatments, mostly for VLS; 81.8% of them had received information about TCs, mainly from dermatologists (86.7%). The median global TOPICOP score was 16.7% (interquartile range. 8.3-30.6), corresponding to a raw median value of 6.0 (interquartile range, 3.0-11.0). The median subscores for the 2 TOPICOP domains, namely, mistaken beliefs and worries about TCs, were equal to each other. At multivariate analysis, none of the collected variables showed a significant association with the degree of TCP. CONCLUSIONS: In our VLS patients, TCP resulted rather low, probably because of the small skin area being treated and the high percentage of women who had already used TCs and who had received information about them from a dermatologist. This latter point suggests that adequate counseling could be a strong basis for greater awareness and serenity in the long-term use of TCs.

Searching for a "Window of Opportunity" in the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Evidence for Therapeutic Benefits of an Early Corticosteroid Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is characterized by progressive anatomical changes which become increasingly severe and irreversible. The objective of this study was to investigate if a "window of opportunity" exists in VLS, i.e., to assess if an early treatment may prevent disease progression and facilitate clearance of symptoms and/or signs. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study included VLS patients treated for the first time with a topical corticosteroid, namely with mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment, for 12 weeks (2016-2021). Scoring of subjective symptoms (global subjective score, GSS, and dyspareunia) and clinical features (global objective score [GOS] and sclerosis-scarring-atrophy) was performed at baseline (T0) and at the control visit (T1). We assessed if the achievement of clearance in GSS, GOS, sclerosis-scarring-atrophy, or dyspareunia depended on the time elapsed between VLS onset and treatment initiation. RESULTS: Among the 168 patients (59.2 ± 13.2 years) included, the median time between VLS onset and first treatment was 14.0 months. At T1, 48.8% of patients achieved clearance of GSS, 28% of GOS and 11.9% of both GSS and GOS, 57.9% of dyspareunia, and 19.2% of sclerosis-scarring-atrophy. The logistic regression model showed that each 10-month increase in treatment initiation adversely affected the clearance of GSS while starting treatment within 6 months of disease onset was significantly associated with clearance of GOS and sclerosis-scarring-atrophy. CONCLUSION: Early treatment is crucial in determining a complete healing of VLS-related symptoms and signs, especially of tissue sclerosis-scarring-atrophy, which appear poorly responsive, or even unresponsive, after the earliest stages of the disease. Thus our findings provide evidence for a "window of opportunity" in VLS treatment.

Contact allergy to SIDAPA baseline series allergens in patients with eyelid dermatitis: An Italian multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent reason of dermatological consultation. Its aetiology is not univocal, being contact dermatitis, both allergic and irritant, the most frequent. The primary sources of allergen exposure include cosmetics, metals, and topical medications, from direct, indirect, or airborne contact. OBJECTIVES: To define the frequency of positive patch test reactions to SIDAPA baseline series allergens, to document positive allergens, and to precise the final diagnosis in patients with eyelid involvement. METHODS: A total of 8557 consecutive patients from 12 Italian Dermatology Clinics underwent patch testing with SIDAPA baseline series in 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) with eyelid involvement with or without other involved sites (E-Group) and (ii) without eyelid involvement (NE-Group). The final diagnosis and the frequency of positive relevant patch test reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: E-Group consisted of 688 patients (females 78.6%, mean age 45.3 years), 8.0% of 8557 consecutively patch-tested patients. The final diagnosis in E-Group was ADC in 42.4%, ICD in 34.2%, and AD in 30.5%. The highest reaction rates were elicited by nickel sulphate and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in both E-Group and NE-Group, even if these allergens were significantly more frequently positive in NE-Group patients than in E-Group ones. Positive patch test reactions to fragrance Mix II, dimethylaminopropylamine, and sorbitan sesquiolate were significantly more frequent in E-Group patients than in NE-Group ones. CONCLUSIONS: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent dermatological complaint. Allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent diagnosis commonly caused by nickel sulphate, isothiazolinones, and fragrances. The surfactants dimethylaminopropylamine and sorbitan sesquioleate are emerging causes of eyelid allergic contact dermatitis.

AtopyReg®, the Prospective Italian Patient Registry for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: Baseline Demographics, Disease Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Treatment History.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: AtopyReg® is a multicenter, prospective, observational, non-profit cohort study on moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults promoted in 2018 by the Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology (SIDeMaST). We aimed to describe baseline demographics, disease characteristics, comorbidities, and therapeutic data of adult patients affected by moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Patients were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years; Eczema Area and Severity Index score ≥ 16 or localization in visible or sensitive areas (face, neck, hands, or genitalia), or a Numeric Rating Scale itch score ≥ 7 or a Numeric Rating Scale sleep loss score ≥ 7, or a Dermatology Life Quality Index score ≥ 10. Demographic and clinical data at baseline were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1170 patients (male 51.1%; mean age: 44.7 years; range 18-90 years) were enrolled by 12 Italian Dermatology Units between January 2019 and November 2022. Skin lesions were eczematous in 83.2% of patients, the most involved site were the flexures (53.9%), face (50.9%), and neck (48.0%). Mean Eczema Area and Severity Index score was 22.3, mean Dermatology Life Quality Index value was 17.6, mean Patient Oriented Eczema Measure score was 13.1, and mean Numeric Rating Scale itch and sleep loss scores were 7.6 and 5.9, respectively. Previous systemic therapies were corticosteroids in 77.7% of patients, antihistamines in 50.3% of patients, and cyclosporine A in 42.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This baseline data analysis deriving from AtopyReg® provides real-life evidence on patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Italy confirming the high burden of atopic dermatitis with a significant impact on patients' quality of life.

Investigating Chronotype and Sleep Quality in Psoriatic Patients: Results from an Observational, Web-Based Survey.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is an inflammatory disease for which the implications and repercussions go far beyond the skin. Psoriasis patients suffer not only due to its skin manifestations and related symptoms but also because of comorbidities and a huge emotional impact. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate chronotype and sleep quality in a group of Italian psoriatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, web-based study was set up by the Dermatology and Clinical Medicine Sections of the Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Italy. The web questionnaire was sent to an email list of an Italian association of psoriatic patients with the aim of recording their main demographic, social, historical, and clinical data. The survey included two questionnaires: the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) and the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-three psoriatic patients (mean age 52.9 ± 12.8 yrs., 32.5% males and 67.5% females) filled out the questionnaire. A good 63.8% of them were affected with psoriasis for more than 10 years, 25.9% reported having a diffuse psoriasis, and 66.7% were on treatment at the time they completed the questionnaire. With reference to chronotype, the mean MEQ score was 55.2 ± 10.7; furthermore, 44% of the patients were "morning-oriented types", M-types, or "larks", 44.5% were "intermediate-types" or I-types, and 11.5% were "evening-oriented types", E-types, or "owls". No correlations were found between chronotype and psoriasis extension. Based on the PSQI results, 72.8% of the study population was judged to have a low sleep quality. Sleep disturbance was significantly related to female sex, living alone, and the presence of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbance is very common in psoriatic patients, especially in those with comorbidities, in females, and in patients who live alone. The chronotype in psoriatic patients does not appear different when compared to the general population, nor does it seem to have any link with psoriasis severity.

Incidence of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus and of Cancer Among Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Patients: Does Socioeconomic Status Have a Role?

OBJECTIVE: Socioeconomic status (SES) impacts on the incidence of many inflammatory diseases and cancers, but there is no evidence on its implication in vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS). The authors aimed to assess possible associations between SES and both occurrence of VLS and cancer occurrence among VLS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of women resident in the province of Ferrara, Italy, affected with VLS diagnosed between 2001 and 2020, was investigated for assessing any association of SES with VLS and cancer incidence. The SES was expressed through an ecological-based deprivation index identifying 5 subgroups. RESULT: Four-hundred women were diagnosed with VLS during the study period, with double the number of cases in the second decade (2011-2020) compared with the first (2001-2010). More VLS patients belonged to the high rather than the low SES groups (p = .032). From VLS diagnosis to 2018 (1,958.4 total person*years at risk), 22 patients received their first diagnosis of cancer, mainly the skin, breast, and vulva. No significant differences in cancer incidence were found between high/medium-high and low/medium-low SES subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that more VLS patients belonged to the highest socioeconomic classes may be due to a more frequent diagnosis in those with greater health seeking behavior and resources. An involvement of SES-related factors in VLS pathophysiological background can also be taken into consideration. Both the lack of marked social and economic differences in the study area and the availability of free visits and screening may account for the lack of association between SES and cancer development.